Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Ooooooo useful. Would you be adverse to a patch adding a policy section that provided the requisite behavior for both Access-Accept and Accounting-Request packets ? Or would you like two policy sections.
I'll look at the patch and see.
i.e. One that has a switch statement for packet type, or two different policies.
The advantage of the one policy is that it's listed with the same name in the require sections of the default config. The disadvantage is the added switch statement.
Hm... yes. I don't have strong opinions on this subject. It may be better to let the CPU do a bit more work than the admin, and use a switch statement to keep the external name the same.
This is more of a general question for future patches... Do you want policies to be self contained, or do you not mind if they sprawl a bit.
"sprawl" ? Alan DeKok.