Thank for your Answer Alan, that's very clear. I will use this option : define multiple virtual servers with one global "listen" section
IP/port for all virtual server
Thank's Philemon Jaomalaza -----Message d'origine----- De : Freeradius-Users [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+philemon.jaomalaza=gmail.com@lists.freeradius.org] De la part de Alan DeKok Envoyé : lundi 25 juin 2018 17:26 À : FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Objet : Re: best performance alternative using multiple virtual server to bound IP/port On Jun 25, 2018, at 4:35 AM, Philemon Jaomalaza <philemon.jaomalaza@gmail.com> wrote:
what the best practice and give best performance and memory usage
The server uses as much memory as it needs. You can't really optimize memory usage as with a database. Performance is a little more complex. 99% of performance issues are outside of the servers control. e.g. databases, certificate validation, etc. make sure all *other* systems are optimized, and FreeRADIUS will be fine. The bottleneck is rarely FreeRADIUS.
if I want to have a separate service per client :
- define multiple virtual servers with one global "listen" section IP/port for all virtual server.
That's likely the simplest to understand. It also means you can have different policies for each virtual server, if you need them.
- define multiple virtual servers and each server has its listen section IP/port different
I wouldn't do that.
- define single virtual servers and use if ....elsif....else to select the proper sql module.
That's simple (one virtual server), but the virtual server is more complex with if / then / else. It works, but I wouldn't do it myself. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html