FreeRADIUS CVS->{BZR,Hg} migration consideration

Alan DeKok aland at
Thu Sep 15 19:51:29 CEST 2005

Nicolas Baradakis <nbk at> wrote:
> I'm not against the idea, but I'm well satisfied with CVS. It's a well
> known tool, and widely spread. It sure lacks features, but there isn't
> many developpers committing code (no problem to merge versions), and
> there isn't more than two active branches (the stable release and the
> head). I don't mind keeping two local copies of the repository.

  Monotone still helps.

  I don't think I'll shut down CVS, but adding a parallel monotone
server would be handy.  It would also enable people outside of the
server to set up their own repositories, and to send patches back as
monotone changes, rather than "diff"s

  Alan DeKok.

More information about the Freeradius-Devel mailing list