upgrade path for distributions
    Alan DeKok 
    aland at deployingradius.com
       
    Sun Sep  2 15:59:51 CEST 2007
    
    
  
Peter Nixon wrote:
> I suggest however that this time around we solve the problem by renaming 
> to "freeradius-server" given that we now have a "freeradius-client".
  Er, yes.  We've discussed that before.  I'm losing... something.  I'll
remember in a bit.
> This doesn't solve the issue of having version 1.x and 2.x installed side by 
> side, but at least it means that there is not a package name conflict.
  Maybe debian can put things into /etc/freeradius, instead of
/etc/raddb.  I do dislike version numbers in filenames.
 And why not call the binary "radiusd"?  I know it conflicts with
Debian's xtradius, etc.  But geez, does anyone *really* use that stuff
any more?
  Alan DeKok.
    
    
More information about the Freeradius-Devel
mailing list