upgrade path for distributions
Alan DeKok
aland at deployingradius.com
Sun Sep 2 15:59:51 CEST 2007
Peter Nixon wrote:
> I suggest however that this time around we solve the problem by renaming
> to "freeradius-server" given that we now have a "freeradius-client".
Er, yes. We've discussed that before. I'm losing... something. I'll
remember in a bit.
> This doesn't solve the issue of having version 1.x and 2.x installed side by
> side, but at least it means that there is not a package name conflict.
Maybe debian can put things into /etc/freeradius, instead of
/etc/raddb. I do dislike version numbers in filenames.
And why not call the binary "radiusd"? I know it conflicts with
Debian's xtradius, etc. But geez, does anyone *really* use that stuff
any more?
Alan DeKok.
More information about the Freeradius-Devel
mailing list