Memory usage in 3.0

[Alan DeKok]

On Sep 18, 2015, at 12:34 PM, A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk wrote:
>>  We'll probably release 3.1 / 3.2 in a year or so.  I'd like to stop new development on 3.0, and keep changes to bug fixes.  Then, the next release becomes the "experiment with new features" release.
> 
> ..which would be 3.2.0 ideally - 3.1.x will be at some unknonw number of x and those who have tried/tested things
> will be ready for 3.2.x production. Then all new stuff goes into 3.3.x - or 4.0.x ?

  Yes.

> it would be good to keep the odd numbered sub-release (3.1, 3.3, 3.5 as the test/dev track with the 3.0, 3.2 etc being
> the stable/release..... with some cut-off time for the previous one.  how long would support be for 3.0.x after
> 3.2.x came out for example? 

  Probably 3 years, given various OS vendors who shall remain nameless.

  Alan DeKok.