Memory usage in 3.0

Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudbardb at
Tue Sep 29 17:14:05 CEST 2015

> On Sep 18, 2015, at 12:56 PM, Alan DeKok <aland at> wrote:
> On Sep 18, 2015, at 12:34 PM, A.L.M.Buxey at wrote:
>>> We'll probably release 3.1 / 3.2 in a year or so.  I'd like to stop new development on 3.0, and keep changes to bug fixes.  Then, the next release becomes the "experiment with new features" release.
>> ..which would be 3.2.0 ideally - 3.1.x will be at some unknonw number of x and those who have tried/tested things
>> will be ready for 3.2.x production. Then all new stuff goes into 3.3.x - or 4.0.x ?
>  Yes.
>> it would be good to keep the odd numbered sub-release (3.1, 3.3, 3.5 as the test/dev track with the 3.0, 3.2 etc being
>> the stable/release..... with some cut-off time for the previous one.  how long would support be for 3.0.x after
>> 3.2.x came out for example?
>  Probably 3 years, given various OS vendors who shall remain nameless.

Limited sympathy for those who won't upgrade between point versions.  This isn't Windows XP, we're not Microsoft.

The changes between v3.0.x and v3.1.x will be minor.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <>

More information about the Freeradius-Devel mailing list