2.x.x and radtest: no IPv6?

[Phil Mayers]

A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> My guess is dual-stack NAS->RADIUS is going to be rare.
>
>ummm. take a hold on that assertion.  the joy of dual-stack deployment
>is that you need to ensure your servers are ready on IPv4 and IPv6 - 
>and as part of that, you need to ensure that your using both methods
>in case either your IPv4 goes...or your IPv6 goes.  we use both
>IPv4 and IPv6 on our kit...and our servers are configured for both..as
>are our NAS kit that can do IPv6 for RADIUS (we had some discussion
>about the best fall-over order to use..which in itself is interesting)
>
>my personal view is that network/sys admins who are avoiding IPv6 as
>much
>as they can are just storing themselves up for a whole lot of pain
>later
>when its forced onto them by internet evolution...embrace the IPv6 now
>whilst you can do it in your own time. it not like you havent been
>given over 15 years of advance notice ;-)
>
>alan
>-
>List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
>http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Sorry, I've been unclear. What I meant was that I strongly suspect nas->radius comms will either be v4 or v6 for a given pairing at any one time, for periods of minutes or hours. Hence treating the addresses as separately should be fine
-- 
Sent from my phone with, please excuse brevity and typos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20130723/ca7069ec/attachment-0001.html>