What is the current status and roadmap for FreeRadius?
Joshua Marshall
j.marshall at arroyo.io
Fri Mar 15 19:47:03 CET 2019
Thank you for the speedy reply. We're implementing stuff with FreeRadius
and are having to abuse it in a few unorthodox ways. Config files with
silent errors or misconfigurations, using what seems to be undocumentd
interactions with LDAP to handle passwords securely -- challenges which
feel like they're from a bygone era.
Looking at the roadmap, and you've probably had to answer these before, why
not switch the codebase to C++ which has wrapped up much of the threading
and modularization work already and has a number of good libraries to
handle networking? Why not use Antlr4 to run your grammars and make start
and runtime problems more apparent as well as providing a more robust
parsing method?
What we are really feeling over here is a lack of modern behavior and
features. Which isn't just one thing, but an enormous amount of work and
polish. That isn't a thing we could ever just ask for and get -- it iosn't
that easy and we know that. But to know what is OK to ask and what might
be possible requires context.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 2:18 PM Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com>
wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2019, at 2:07 PM, Joshua Marshall <j.marshall at arroyo.io> wrote:
> >
> > I don't have a problem needing solving, but I would like context about
> > FreeRadius. What is happening with the v4 work?
>
> Lots. There's a lot to do, but it's making good progress.
>
> https://wiki.freeradius.org/design/version4/Home
>
> > What changes and challenges are being faced?
>
> The main challenge is time.
>
> The changes are sweeping. While the configuration files look largely
> similar, almost everything has changed under the hood.
>
> Things which used to be impossible are now trivial. But some simple
> things have unfortunately gotten more complex.
>
> The main thing is that the requests are now fully asynchronous. The
> interpreter has it's own scheduler, and each request has it's own
> interpreter stack. The result is that the server needs fewer threads to
> actually run things.
>
> > What does the roadmap look like?
>
> See the Wiki page above.
>
> > Is there going to be a formalization of unlang?
>
> What does that mean?
>
> > What work is currently being done?
>
> Lots and lots. The best thing here is to watch the git log.
>
> Perhaps a better question is this: What are you looking for?
>
> i.e. if you just want to know about v4, download it and look. On the
> other hand, if you're looking for a particular feature, then it's best to
> ask about that.
>
> Alan DeKok.
>
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
--
Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by
replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that
the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the
acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not
invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic
reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment.
<https://twitter.com/arroyo_networks>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/arroyo-networks>
<https://www.github.com/ArroyoNetworks>
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list