this is the kind of @## () response one can see online from these ignorant retards (+ online bravery!) who wrote some sucking code for this almost dead so called protocol. doesn't get it. ________________________________ From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 2:37 AM Subject: Re: configure challenge.. Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
On 4 Sep 2012, at 05:21, Rod Luzic <rodluzic@yahoo.com> wrote:
put some links dummy- people have their own features to worry about unlike spend whole life doing this almost obsolete Radius stuff like you. how would one configure A-C. damn simple question.
and what features would those be?
I'm all for being a complete and utter asshole when the context justifies it, but insulting people like that buys you nothing*.
update control { Packet-Response-Type := Access-Challenge }
The server will complain depending on version, but it still works.
It doesn't tie the NEXT Access-Request to the current one. That's what the State attribute is for. And no, I won't give an example. There's already example code in the server to do that. Only idiots and the terminally lazy can't find it. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html