Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
On Jul 22, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
On Jul 22, 2015, at 10:08 PM, Todd Smith <todd@sohovfx.com> wrote:
We are just warming up to radius implementation, I am testing on OpenSuSE13.2 with the following packages:
freeradius-server-3.0.3-3.8.1.x86_64
Use 3.0.9. We're not going to debug issues which were tracked down and fixed 6 months ago.
Seriously. Can someone explain the thinking behind users reporting defects on out of date versions?
Do they expect us to go back in time, to before we did that release and fix it, so they don't experience the issue in the present?
Do they expect us to release patched versions of the 3.0.3 SuSE packages?
What's the deal here? Why do people do this? OP isn't the first...
I think most people try to stick to a "stable" software combination provided by their favourite Linux distro, for whatever definition of "stable". I guess the best way for you to handle this is to have an auto-text snippet in your favourite MUA when responding. ;-) Ciao, Michael.