- Freeradius-Users - lists.freeradius.org

Please resend this message to Kim Jones'
by Kim 31 May '05

31 May '05

Please resend this message to Kim Jones' new email address. Thank You. kim(a)omegatechinc.com

1 0

controlling the auth by CallingStationId
by Ernesto Freyre Ramírez 31 May '05

31 May '05

Dear Sirs, please , I hope someone here could to help me, I wish to control the authentication process by including a check of the CallingStationId parameter, being some generic features of it, or also all the value of the same, please some hint aboout where I must to configure this task? Thank you Ernesto Freyre Ramírez

2 1

Authenticate against Mac OS X Open Directory
by Ekkehard Burkon 31 May '05

31 May '05

Hi, did anyone successfully authenticate against a Mac OS X servers Open Directory? I need it for 802.1x/WPA. Are there any docs on the web? Thank you for any help. Ekkehard --

2 1

time request
by Thiago Felipe de Andrade 31 May '05

31 May '05

2 1

Filter
by José Berenguer 31 May '05

31 May '05

Hello, Anyone can tell me where can I find some instructions about how to configure the "filter=" option in the "module ldap" subsection of radiusd.conf? Thanks a lot! -- ********************************************************************** José Berenguer Giménez Área de Comunicaciones-Servicio de Informática UNIVERSIDAD DE ALMERÍA Crta. de Sacramento s/n, 04120 - Almería Tlf.: 950014014 E-mail: jose(a)ual.es **********************************************************************

2 1

Please resend this message to Kim Jones'
by Kim 31 May '05

31 May '05

Please resend this message to Kim Jones' new email address. Thank You. kim(a)omegatechinc.com

1 0

Please resend this message to Kim Jones'
by Kim 31 May '05

31 May '05

Please resend this message to Kim Jones' new email address. Thank You. kim(a)omegatechinc.com

1 0

Fw: Please resend this message to Kim Jones'
by Christopher Bootland 31 May '05

31 May '05

Thanks Jim, I've added the offender to my blocked sender list <plonk>. ;-) Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Seymour" <jseymour(a)linxnet.com> To: <freeradius-users(a)lists.freeradius.org> Cc: <owner-freeradius-users(a)lists.freeradius.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 1:17 PM Subject: Re: Please resend this message to Kim Jones' > "Christopher Bootland" <bootland(a)cyberone.com.au> wrote: >> >> >> Why is Kim Jones at SimplyNet (?) harvesting addresses on this mailing >> list? >> I can't think of a valid reason why a third-party needs to know. Does >> anybody have any more information? > > Most likely what's happening is he, or whomever at his old email > address, is running lame email software that's auto-responding to > traffic from the mailing list. This is, more often than not, the fault > of Windows-based malware that doesn't know any better than to > auto-respond to "bulk" or "list" precedence messages, or to messages > not addressed directly to the recipient. The "X-Mailer: <SMTP32 > v8.05>" in his auto-responses suggests this is another such example. > > The list owner needs to manually remove "kim(a)simplynet.net" from the > mailing list. > > Jim > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See > http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by CyberOne E-Mail Spam and > Virus Protection Service, and is believed to > be clean from viruses. CyberOne accepts no > responsibility for the content of messages > in transit through our servers. > -- > Suspected unsolicited commercial bulk messages > (SPAM) have been marked with {Spam?} tag in > the subject line enabling you to filter them out > by using your mail software's filtering capabilities. >

1 0

Please resend this message to Kim Jones'
by Kim 31 May '05

31 May '05

Please resend this message to Kim Jones' new email address. Thank You. kim(a)omegatechinc.com

1 0

RE: ldap huntgroups and groups
by alan walters 31 May '05

31 May '05

Continuing with huntgroups and groups. I followed the most recent instructions below. The client uses the default group below. I see the reply message come through in the request But the request gets access accept instead of access reject????? > > ######################################################################## > # > ### default ldap group does not succeed > ######################################################################## > ## > > DEFAULT Auth-Type := Reject > Reply-Message = "sorry you are not allowed to dial in here" > The reply message should go on the second line on this one. Reply message is not a check item. Also, technically, you don't need Simultaneous User, since they are being rejected this session will never be added. Your user was found in a group, however, it should have been rejected since you have fall-though = 1 (yes). It should have fallen through to the default reject line. Note: This is probably not what you want, because all users will be rejected when you fix the Reject line. I would change Fall-Through = no (0), to all your Ldap-Group entries above it. Move the Reply-Message to the second line. DEFAULT Auth-Type := Reject Reply-Message = "You cannot dial in here"

1 0