- Freeradius-Users - lists.freeradius.org

Re: Help on Freeradius v3
by KAVYA PRABHAKAR 01 Oct '14

01 Oct '14

Hi, When I run radiusd -X command(FR v3.0.3), it throws me the following error, because of which services are not getting started. Refusing to start with libssl version OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 0x01000106f (1.0.1f-15) (in range 1.0.1-0 - 1.0.1f-15) I changed allow_vulnerable_openssl = yes in radiusd.conf file and ran radius in debug mode. Still error did not change. Could anybody guide me where I am going wrong. Thanks, Kavya

2 1

Re: Beginner help
by KAVYA PRABHAKAR 01 Oct '14

01 Oct '14

Hi, When I run radiusd -X command(FR v3.0.3), it throws me the following error, because of which services are not getting started. Refusing to start with libssl version OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 0x01000106f (1.0.1f-15) (in range 1.0.1-0 - 1.0.1f-15) I changed allow_vulnerable_openssl = yes in radiusd.conf file and ran radius in debug mode. Still error did not change. Thanks, Kavya

1 1

Re: Freeradius-Users Digest, Vol 114, Issue 1
by KAVYA PRABHAKAR 01 Oct '14

01 Oct '14

Hi, I am using freeradius v3.0.4 on ubuntu 14.04. I tried to send radius request using command "radtest test password localhost 0 testing123" I got no reply from server. When I checked for open ports I didnot see any ports opened for freeradius. What is the command to start freeradius services? I tried /etc/init/d/freeradius restart which did not work Thanks, Kavya On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:09 AM, < freeradius-users-request(a)lists.freeradius.org> wrote: > Send Freeradius-Users mailing list submissions to > freeradius-users(a)lists.freeradius.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.freeradius.org/mailman/listinfo/freeradius-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freeradius-users-request(a)lists.freeradius.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freeradius-users-owner(a)lists.freeradius.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Freeradius-Users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. RE: Maximum username length > (Franks Andy (RLZ) IT Systems Engineer) > 2. Re: Maximum username length (Alan DeKok) > 3. Authentication and Authorization (Alex Gregory) > 4. Re: Authentication and Authorization (Nick Owen) > 5. Re: Authentication and Authorization (Alex Gregory) > 6. Re: Authentication and Authorization (Alan DeKok) > 7. EAP-GTC & Yubikey (cellkites(a)hushmail.com) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:55:56 +0100 > From: "Franks Andy \(RLZ\) IT Systems Engineer" > <Andy.Franks(a)sath.nhs.uk> > To: "FreeRadius users mailing list" > <freeradius-users(a)lists.freeradius.org> > Subject: RE: Maximum username length > Message-ID: <20140930145557.4FCC5448906(a)nhs-pd1e-esg106.ad1.nhs.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > They should make a movie.. > > So you're suggesting I reprogram pfsense then? I'll have to inform the > boss it's going to take a bit longer! > > Anyway, point taken, I'll have to see what this entails. The string was > looking to be pretty long anyway. > :-) > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: freeradius-users-bounces+andy.franks= > sath.nhs.uk(a)lists.freeradius.org [mailto: > freeradius-users-bounces+andy.franks=sath.nhs.uk(a)lists.freeradius.org] On > Behalf Of Alan DeKok > Sent: 30 September 2014 14:03 > To: FreeRadius users mailing list > Subject: Re: Maximum username length > > Franks Andy (RLZ) IT Systems Engineer wrote: > > We?re going to attempt to pass a number of delimited variables > > through via the username field > > Dear god no. This is a *terrible* idea. It will cause global warming, > rickets, plagues, alien invasions, and help bring on the coming apocalypse. > > > and split them at the freeradius end, mostly to avoid rewriting the > > php in the captive portal to use more orthodox existing attributes. > > There's no good reason to push crap onto someone else. Your laziness > just makes life harder for everyone else. > > If you care about your users, *don't* do this. > > > Can someone confirm the maximum username field length? I can see in > > the RFCs that 63 is the recommended minimum nas length but there?s not > > much else I can see in there. > > A lot of equipment and systems won't handle more than 63 characters. > > This is a terrible, evil, disgusting idea. RADIUS is full of enough > crap already without people deliberately adding more. > > Alan DeKok. > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See > http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:36:39 -0400 > From: Alan DeKok <aland(a)deployingradius.com> > To: FreeRadius users mailing list > <freeradius-users(a)lists.freeradius.org> > Subject: Re: Maximum username length > Message-ID: <542ACE07.9050601(a)deployingradius.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Franks Andy (RLZ) IT Systems Engineer wrote: > > So you're suggesting I reprogram pfsense then? I'll have to inform the > boss it's going to take a bit longer! > > You can fix pfsense once, or thousands of administrators can curse > your name while they try to "fix" their RADIUS server so that it works > with a non-standard username. > > That's a lot of negative karma. > > Alan DeKok. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:18:20 +0000 > From: Alex Gregory <alex(a)c2company.com> > To: FreeRadius users mailing list > <freeradius-users(a)lists.freeradius.org> > Subject: Authentication and Authorization > Message-ID: <7A1FE1A4-0B02-4D9E-AB1A-B80D64AF82D3(a)c2company.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hello- > > If I have both LDAP and Proxy configured will FreeRadius use both? What I > am looking for is the FreeRadius server authorize a user in LDAP and if > that passes forward the user to the upstream OTP radius server (via > proxy.conf) for authentication. I believe its doing this now with the LDAP > module, just authenticating locally, rather than proxied. > > Is this possible? > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:02:20 -0400 > From: Nick Owen <owen.nick(a)gmail.com> > To: FreeRadius users mailing list > <freeradius-users(a)lists.freeradius.org> > Subject: Re: Authentication and Authorization > Message-ID: > < > CAJC4Zap-F3xJHhJPXjx9vRZoC6-4EHOaafv4wummZpRTdGi9gQ(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Yes, see this tutorial: > > https://www.wikidsystems.com/support/wikid-support-center/how-to/how-to-add… > . > Note that you login with the username and OTP. No ldap password is > needed. > > HTH, > > Nick > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Alex Gregory <alex(a)c2company.com> wrote: > > Hello- > > > > If I have both LDAP and Proxy configured will FreeRadius use both? What > I am looking for is the FreeRadius server authorize a user in LDAP and if > that passes forward the user to the upstream OTP radius server (via > proxy.conf) for authentication. I believe its doing this now with the LDAP > module, just authenticating locally, rather than proxied. > > > > Is this possible? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alex > > > > - > > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See > http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > > > > -- > -- > Nick Owen > WiKID Systems, Inc. > http://www.wikidsystems.com > Commercial/Open Source Two-Factor Authentication > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:49:00 +0000 > From: Alex Gregory <alex(a)c2company.com> > To: FreeRadius users mailing list > <freeradius-users(a)lists.freeradius.org> > Subject: Re: Authentication and Authorization > Message-ID: <BCBCCE17-2331-4F9E-B664-D66FF01473DA(a)c2company.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Thank you for the link. I have the OTP working on a test server now with > proxying. The problem is the hosted OTP server does not supply any group > or attribute information back yet like this Wikid server does. But I have > two different user groups for two different networks (Corp and Dev users) > that need to be differentiated. > > In production have two virtual radius servers each doing an LDAP lookup > into a different group. If a user tries to access the incorrect network > they are denied because they are not in that group. Works great. If I > alter the server to proxy the request with the LDAP module configured will > it handle things properly? > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > On Sep 30, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Nick Owen <owen.nick(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes, see this tutorial: > > > https://www.wikidsystems.com/support/wikid-support-center/how-to/how-to-add… > . > > Note that you login with the username and OTP. No ldap password is > > needed. > > > > HTH, > > > > Nick > > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Alex Gregory <alex(a)c2company.com> > wrote: > >> Hello- > >> > >> If I have both LDAP and Proxy configured will FreeRadius use both? > What I am looking for is the FreeRadius server authorize a user in LDAP and > if that passes forward the user to the upstream OTP radius server (via > proxy.conf) for authentication. I believe its doing this now with the LDAP > module, just authenticating locally, rather than proxied. > >> > >> Is this possible? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Alex > >> > >> - > >> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See > http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > > > > > > > > -- > > -- > > Nick Owen > > WiKID Systems, Inc. > > http://www.wikidsystems.com > > Commercial/Open Source Two-Factor Authentication > > - > > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See > http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 21:26:56 -0400 > From: Alan DeKok <aland(a)deployingradius.com> > To: FreeRadius users mailing list > <freeradius-users(a)lists.freeradius.org> > Subject: Re: Authentication and Authorization > Message-ID: <542B5860.5010803(a)deployingradius.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Alex Gregory wrote: > > Thank you for the link. I have the OTP working on a test server now > with proxying. The problem is the hosted OTP server does not supply any > group or attribute information back yet like this Wikid server does. > > There are no standard RADIUS attributes which carry that information. > If you need it, the OTP server may not even be able to send that > information in RADIUS. > > > But I have two different user groups for two different networks (Corp > and Dev users) that need to be differentiated. > > > > In production have two virtual radius servers each doing an LDAP lookup > into a different group. If a user tries to access the incorrect network > they are denied because they are not in that group. Works great. If I > alter the server to proxy the request with the LDAP module configured will > it handle things properly? > > LDAP lookups are completely independent of proxying. > > If configured correctly, it should work. > > Alan DeKok. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 13:39:23 +0800 > From: cellkites(a)hushmail.com > To: freeradius-users(a)lists.freeradius.org > Subject: EAP-GTC & Yubikey > Message-ID: <20141001053923.E3D29C0105(a)smtp.hushmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I've been attempting to integrate yubikeys with freeradius and have > had great success with the included yubikey module authenticating > against both stored aes keys and a private otp validation server. > However I am now attempting to use them in conjunction with EAP-GTC > and am slightly lost. > > Under the gtc section of the eap module config i see that a user > password is returned from the connecting client and passed onto > another module for authentication. Is it possible to then pass this to > the yubikey module to extract the otp portion, authenticate the otp > and then continue with PAP authentication using the users password? > > Is there another way i should be going about this? >

1 0

RE: Maximum username length
by Franks Andy (RLZ) IT Systems Engineer 30 Sep '14

30 Sep '14

They should make a movie.. So you're suggesting I reprogram pfsense then? I'll have to inform the boss it's going to take a bit longer! Anyway, point taken, I'll have to see what this entails. The string was looking to be pretty long anyway. :-) -----Original Message----- From: freeradius-users-bounces+andy.franks=sath.nhs.uk(a)lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+andy.franks=sath.nhs.uk@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok Sent: 30 September 2014 14:03 To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Maximum username length Franks Andy (RLZ) IT Systems Engineer wrote: > We’re going to attempt to pass a number of delimited variables > through via the username field Dear god no. This is a *terrible* idea. It will cause global warming, rickets, plagues, alien invasions, and help bring on the coming apocalypse. > and split them at the freeradius end, mostly to avoid rewriting the > php in the captive portal to use more orthodox existing attributes. There's no good reason to push crap onto someone else. Your laziness just makes life harder for everyone else. If you care about your users, *don't* do this. > Can someone confirm the maximum username field length? I can see in > the RFCs that 63 is the recommended minimum nas length but there’s not > much else I can see in there. A lot of equipment and systems won't handle more than 63 characters. This is a terrible, evil, disgusting idea. RADIUS is full of enough crap already without people deliberately adding more. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

2 1

Maximum username length
by Franks Andy (RLZ) IT Systems Engineer 30 Sep '14

30 Sep '14

Hi all, We have a project trying to integrate pfsense and freeradus together to form a captive portal, not rocket science. We're going to attempt to pass a number of delimited variables through via the username field and split them at the freeradius end, mostly to avoid rewriting the php in the captive portal to use more orthodox existing attributes. Can someone confirm the maximum username field length? I can see in the RFCs that 63 is the recommended minimum nas length but there's not much else I can see in there. Thanks Andy

3 2

RE: Maximum username length
by Franks Andy (RLZ) IT Systems Engineer 30 Sep '14

30 Sep '14

Hi Stefan, Yes user-name, missed the hyphen. Thanks for the information. Andy -----Original Message----- From: freeradius-users-bounces+andy.franks=sath.nhs.uk(a)lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+andy.franks=sath.nhs.uk@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Paetow Sent: 30 September 2014 11:22 To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Maximum username length Username as in the RADIUS User-Name attribute? If so, it's a standard attribute, so a length of 253 octets (250 would probably be safer). Stefan Paetow Moonshot Industry & Research Liaison Coordinator t: +44 (0)1235 822 125 Janet, the UK’s research and education network. On 30 Sep 2014, at 10:21, Franks Andy (RLZ) IT Systems Engineer <Andy.Franks(a)sath.nhs.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > > We have a project trying to integrate pfsense and freeradus together to form a captive portal, not rocket science. > > We’re going to attempt to pass a number of delimited variables through via the username field and split them at the freeradius end, mostly to avoid rewriting the php in the captive portal to use more orthodox existing attributes. > > Can someone confirm the maximum username field length? I can see in the RFCs that 63 is the recommended minimum nas length but there’s not much else I can see in there. > > Thanks > > Andy > > - > List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See > http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html Janet(UK) is a trading name of Jisc Collections and Janet Limited, a not-for-profit company which is registered in England under No. 2881024 and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG. VAT No. 614944238 - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

1 0

Per Proxy Server Statistics
by Himanshu Pandey 30 Sep '14

30 Sep '14

Hi Friends, I have a question? Do radius server support Per Proxy Server Statistics like minimum response time, maximum response time, Average response time, Mean response time? Regards, Sonu

3 2

TCP/ UDP SMTP, POP, HTTP, SIP services FreeRADIUS
by Russell Mike 30 Sep '14

30 Sep '14

Dear List How can i configure FreeRADIUS to allow a user for following SMTP, POP, HTTP, SIP services Only? No other network access. PORTS: 25,110,143 80, 5060,5061 Thanks RM --

3 4

Show module statistics using radmin
by Himanshu Pandey 30 Sep '14

30 Sep '14

Dear Alan, To show my module statistics using radmin I referred command.c and radmin.c and added my new command "show module statistics <module>". To brief you, I added an usigned array of module return codes in module_instance_t structure and updated the array in call_modsingle() function using the statement: modsingle *sp; sp->modinst->rtcode[result] = sp->modinst->rtcode[result] + 1; I tested this and it is giving 100% correct results. Now I have written a function static int command_show_module_statistics(rad_listen_t *listener, int argc, char *argv[]) in command.c file. I have used radius methods & structures only in this function, so guide me which is correct/wrong or what else radius methods or structures should be used. The problem is that correct module statistics are not being diplayed rather it is displaying 0 statistics for all modules.Please help me resolve this. Here goes the function code: static int command_show_module_statistics(rad_listen_t *listener, int argc, char *argv[]) { int i; CONF_SECTION *cs; module_instance_t const *mi; if (argc != 1) { cprintf(listener, "ERROR: No module name was given\n"); return 0; } cs = cf_section_find("modules"); if (!cs) return 0; mi = find_module_instance(cs, argv[0], false); if (!mi) { cprintf(listener, "ERROR: No such module \"%s\"\n", argv[0]); return 0; } for (i = 0; i < RLM_MODULE_NUMCODES; i++) { cprintf(listener, "\nRTCODE[%d]=%ld\n",i,mi->rtcode[i]); } return 1; /* success */ } Regards, Sonu

2 1

Re: Beginner help
by KAVYA PRABHAKAR 30 Sep '14

30 Sep '14

Hi, I am trying to send RADIUS authentication only packet from NAS IP to Freeradius server. Over UDP it worked fine. Now I have got a certificate installed on Freeradius server, as I am willing to send Radius auth request over TLS connection. Before sending request from NAS I am trying to create TLS conenction b/n NAS ip and Freeradius server. I want that connection to happen over 1814 port. What configuration changes should I be doing for the same(port number)? What other configuration needs to be done on Freeradius server to make TLS work? Freeradius server is running on ubuntu 14.04. Thanks, Kavya

2 1