- Freeradius-Users - lists.freeradius.org

communication problem between Freeradius and MYSQL
by Gregorio Remigio García 26 Nov '24

26 Nov '24

Hello, I am having a problem with the communication between freeradius and my MYQL database, it seems freeradius is having a problem establishing the connection between the two. if you could help me.

3 2

LUA Redis Integration
by Gabriel Marais 25 Nov '24

25 Nov '24

Good morning, I was wondering if anyone has successfully integrated LUA with Redis in freeRADIUS. I am trying to build in a LUA function in /etc/freeradius/mods-enabled/redis that calls for a result from a redis db but I get a syntax error in my LUA {} code :- /etc/freeradius/mods-enabled/redis[108]: Expecting section start brace '{' after "local imei" This is my code block:- lua { function imei_locking { local imei = redis.call('HGET',KEYS[1],'imei') local result = 'false' if imei == ARGV[1] then result = 'true' end return result } } The idea is to reject connections based on the result returned from the LUA call in the authorize {} section. Hope I'm making sense. If anyone can share their ideas, I'd appreciate it. Regards, Gabriel

6 12

COA
by Zikrullo S. 20 Nov '24

20 Nov '24

Hi, I've configured freeradius, I've got this type network configuration 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet 10.10.6.10/32 scope global lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: ens160: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:0c:29:2f:f4:26 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff altname enp3s0 inet 10.251.4.150/25 brd 10.251.4.255 scope global ens160 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe2f:f426/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: ens192: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:0c:29:2f:f4:30 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff altname enp11s0 inet 10.10.0.25/29 brd 10.10.0.31 scope global ens192 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe2f:f430/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever all requests and responses work as well but when i wanna send coa to my NaS, freeRadius sends it from different IP - 10.10.0.25, meanwhile my NaS accepts packets only from one IP, my loopback IP - 10.10.6.10

3 2

FreeRadius COA
by Zikrullo S. 20 Nov '24

20 Nov '24

Hi, I've configured freeradius, I've got this type network configuration 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet 10.10.6.10/32 scope global lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: ens160: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:0c:29:2f:f4:26 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff altname enp3s0 inet 10.251.4.150/25 brd 10.251.4.255 scope global ens160 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe2f:f426/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: ens192: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:0c:29:2f:f4:30 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff altname enp11s0 inet 10.10.0.25/29 brd 10.10.0.31 scope global ens192 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe2f:f430/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever all requests and responses work as well but when i wanna send coa to my NaS, freeRadius sends it from different IP, meanwhile my NaS accepts packets only from one IP, my loopback IP - 10.10.6.10

1 0

Authenticate with machine account and without ntlm_auth
by Rodrigo Antunes 19 Nov '24

19 Nov '24

Hi, I'd like to authenticate a PC using it's machine account and the mschap module, without calling ntlm_auth, is this possible? I noticed that the machine send its user as "host/machinename" but I don't know how to obtain and check its password. Maybe I should check the nt-hashes in users file? Thanks

6 18

Can't run freeradius after reboot
by Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay 19 Nov '24

19 Nov '24

Hi, I think there were some updates on our RHEL 9 machine where I test frreeradius, and now radiusd refuses to run: radiusd -X Error : tls - libssl version mismatch. built: 30000070 linked: 30200020 I upgraded to 3.2.6, and it didn’t seem to fix. Any clues on how to fix this? Best, Francis

2 2

How to get FR user check items override group check items
by Abraham Jacob 18 Nov '24

18 Nov '24

I have been using FreeRADIUS 1.1 (yeah very old) on an old Debian server over the years without any issues. Thank you for wonderful software! Now, as part of the server upgrade, I tried installing version 3.2.1 in Debian 12 and I was able to configure it except for one issue. In v1.1 user attributes get priority over group items. I am using the same SQL tables from v1.1. There I am setting Session-Timeout to 3600 in the radgroupcheck table. For some select users I set Session-Timeout differently, say 7200. In v1.1, I am seeing Session-Timeout = 7200 for Access-Accept while in v3.2.1 it is 3600. I checked the server in debug mode and found following <snip> .... (0) sql: User found in radcheck table (0) sql: Conditional check items matched, merging assignment check items (0) sql: Session-Timeout := 7200 (0) sql: Crypt-Password := "$1$bd1rxwue$ab3wiY34Cjfk5QM13/vNy0" .... (0) sql: User found in the group table (0) sql: EXPAND SELECT id, groupname, attribute, Value, op FROM radgroupcheck WHERE groupname = '%{S QL-Group}' ORDER BY id (0) sql: --> SELECT id, groupname, attribute, Value, op FROM radgroupcheck WHERE groupname = 'VPN -60-Min' ORDER BY id (0) sql: Executing select query: SELECT id, groupname, attribute, Value, op FROM radgroupcheck WHERE groupname = 'VPN-60-Min' ORDER BY id (0) sql: Group "VPN-60-Min": Conditional check items matched (0) sql: Group "VPN-60-Min": Merging assignment check items (0) sql: Session-Timeout := 3600 .... (0) dailycounter: Allowing user, &control:Session-Timeout value (3600) is greater than counter value (0) (0) dailycounter: Setting &reply:Session-Timeout value to 3600 .... Sent Access-Accept Id 55 from 192.168.3.180:1812 to 192.168.3.180:39999 length 32 (0) Idle-Timeout = 600 (0) Session-Timeout = 3600 (0) Finished request </snip> So I think this is the expected behaviour in the new version. Following are the sql contents. Table radgroupreply: +----+------------+--------------+----+-------+ | id | groupname | attribute | op | value | +----+------------+--------------+----+-------+ | 9 | VPN-60-Min | Idle-Timeout | := | 600 | +----+------------+--------------+----+-------+ Table radgroupcheck: +----+------------+-----------------+----+-------+ | id | groupname | attribute | op | value | +----+------------+-----------------+----+-------+ | 2 | VPN-60-Min | Session-Timeout | := | 3600 | +----+------------+-----------------+----+-------+ Table: radcheck: +----+----------+-----------------+----+------------------------------------+ | id | username | attribute | op | value | +----+----------+-----------------+----+------------------------------------+ | 18 | vpn-user | Session-Timeout | := | 7200 | | 19 | vpn-user | Crypt-Password | := | $1$bd1rxwue$ab3wiY34Cjfk5QM13/vNy0 | +----+----------+-----------------+----+------------------------------------+ Now my question: Is there any configuration options available to get the old v1.1 behaviour? This way I don't have to set Session-Timeout for all my users, just a select few who need to be different from default. Thanks Abraham

3 9

Using the rest module
by Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay 17 Nov '24

17 Nov '24

Hi, I’m fairly new to Freeradius, and today I took the time to read the documentation and to search what’s a best practice to implement some polling-based (blocking) authentication with FreeRADIUS towards a rest api server. I tried with Python first, but since I’m having trouble with concurrency, so I’m exploring other alternatives. The rest module seems like a fit, but I didn’t find much about other possibilities rather than interpreting the response code and having a json as a response that match existing attributes. In my case, I need simply to evaluate a value of a nested json key that doesn’t really match any existing attributes. Is there a way to do it? For example: { ‘detail’ : { ‘ result’ : { ‘value’ :’true’}}} I need to authenticate that user based on the value of ‘value’. Is the rest module a good tool for this? I saw that there is a json module that might be used with the rest, but it doesn’t seem to be available for the version I am using (3.0.21 on RHEL 9). I have three api calls, to three different url’s, so I figured out how to create multiple instances of the rest module, which is great. It’s just the response logic that I’m failing to understand. Could anyone point me to the right direction? Best, Francis

2 2

Using the authenticate function on rlm_python
by Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay 16 Nov '24

16 Nov '24

Hi there, I am trying to write a python script to be used by the python module of Freeradius. My main goal is to send an Access-Challenge to the user so that he would reply to that challenge. On perl, usually this «Response-Packet-Type» is configured on RAD_CHECK. But how do we send this in Python? I tried this: def authenticate(p): print("*** authenticate ***") print("") radiusd.radlog(radiusd.L_INFO, "*** log call in authenticate ***") print("") print(p) print(radiusd.config) print("") reply = ( ('Reply-Message', 'Hello from rlm_python'), ('State', 'test'), ('Response-Packet-Type', 'Access-Challenge') ) # config = ( ('Response-Packet-Type' , 'Acccess-Challenge'), ) config = ( ('Cleartext-Password' , '123'), ) return (radiusd.RLM_MODULE_HANDLED, reply,None) But without any success. Any clues of what to do here? Best, Francis -- Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay Oslo, Norway

2 11

Re: Add TLS version to logs with linelog in FreeRADIUS 3.2.4
by Dominic Stalder 15 Nov '24

15 Nov '24

Hi guys * another try, after failing to reach the mailing list for this topic with my email address * Coming back to this topic of TLS logging in FreeRADIUS 3.2.4, are there any news on this topic? I recently updated to FreeRADIUS 3.2.6, but TLS version is still missing. In the debug output (freeradius -X) I was missing the follwing attributes since 2.3.4: (10) update { (10) &reply::Framed-MTU += &session-state:Framed-MTU[*] -> 1014 ... (10) &reply::TLS-Session-Cipher-Suite += &session-state:TLS-Session-Cipher-Suite[*] -> 'ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384' (10) &reply::TLS-Session-Version += &session-state:TLS-Session-Version[*] -> 'TLS 1.2' Thanks and regards Dominic

2 1